Daddytypes posts well on the most absurd reaction to the cover of a recent edition of baby talk magazine. If Mum has a hard time breastfeeding then no drama, formula it is and let's all carry on. No blame, no judgement. But for those Mums who do breastfeed, how are they meant to operate in society if they have to duck for cover when bub needs a boob? If breastfeeding is so abhorrent to the public, the species is in real trouble.
More comment can be found here. Let the madness stop!
We are big fans of co-sleeping with the kids. They will be all grown up and won't want to know about us soon so while they are pint sized, it's something we think makes sense. The challenge with our # 2 son is that in the middle of the night he wakes and expects to meet Mum for a top up. Well, Mum's kind of over that - the President needs her sleep! So I have stepped into the breach offering nothing but a pat on the back when he wakes up. Mum sleeps way on the other side of the bed.
To say the little fella is not agreeing with the new arrangement is an understatement. But overall, there is a lot more sleeping going on. Until of course he woke the other night and happened to hear his Mum cough. Then it was on...a midnight scramble across the bed to seek out the source of the cough. For where there is a cough, there could be milk. He must be eating his carrots because his night vision is unbelievably good. Needless to say the CEO is now way sleepy.
We now need a plan B...put Mum in the cot wearing cammo maybe?
Absolute vindication for my thoughts around our technology dilemma back in June. Front page of my local rag back home shows a Dell computer spontaneously combusting. I thought it was just their customer service that was poor. Now you get a flame thrower with every computer. As someone said the other day, the only part of Dell that is American is the founder. Every other element is outsourced.
Juxtaposed against my previous breezy post, a note on a far more bleak note. On Friday I received two enquiries from interested overseas parties who wanted to distribute gDiapers. Not that abnormal except for the fact that the emails came from companies in Israel and Lebanon.
Who has time to run a business when bombs are raining down on you one wonders?
I thought I could introduce them to each other and see if we could start building bridges. Sure it's complicated beyond belief and we would need to in fact engage two other key parties, namely Hezbollah and Hamas but we're closer.
By ROB WALKER
Jason and Kimberley Graham-Nye could have named their product the Eco-Diaper. After all, one of their chief motivations for selling a "flushable diaper system" is to offer an alternative to disposable diapers, which contribute to landfills and take years to biodegrade. But instead they went with the name gDiapers, which doesn't mean anything.
Well, they would put it differently: they say that the "g" could stand for "green," but it could also mean "groovy." The point is to leave things vague enough that a consumer might be drawn in by gDiapers'
fashionably bright colors, comfort or perhaps just the novelty factor, and then learn that, "P.S., they save the planet," Jason suggests. While saving the planet seems like sort of too big a deal to reduce to
a postscript, the Graham-Nyes figure too much emphasis on the ecofactor would restrict their product's appeal to what they call "dark green" consumers. GDiapers were introduced in the U.S. just six months ago in a handful of green-friendly stores like the New Seasons Market in Portland, Ore., but after a successful test run at Whole Foods outlets on the West Coast, that chain will soon distribute the product nationally.
GDiapers are positioned as a third option for parents facing the familiar cloth-or-disposable choice. A $25 starter set comes with two pairs of washable "pants" (in "groovy" red, orange, blue or green) and
10 removable liners; when a liner is soiled, it's flushed down the toilet. A refill pack of 32 flushable liners costs $14, roughly the same as 40 Huggies. The Graham-Nyes did not invent the product: they
found it at a baby-products expo in Australia, where it has been on the market since 1991 under the name Baby Weenees Eco Nappy Products. They loved the product and felt strongly that it could be successful in other parts of the world — provided it was given a different image, with more broad appeal. So they bought the rights to market and sell it outside of Australia and New Zealand.
Although greenness seems trendier than ever, its limitations as a selling point are the subject of a recent article in the journal Environment, titled "Avoiding Green Marketing Myopia." The authors
(Jacquelyn Ottman, Edwin Stafford and Cathy Hartman) argue that many ecofriendly products fail precisely because the companies that make them put too much emphasis on the whole save-the-planet thing. To reach the mainstream, they say, such products need the attributes any product needs: cost effectiveness, convenience, status and so on. The article's marquee example is a light bulb that flopped when it was positioned as Earth-friendly but took off when it was reintroduced as a money-saver. In an interview, Stafford and Hartman pointed to the Prius, which enjoys a whopping price premium for reasons that probably have as much to do with status as with saving the planet.
Status is now the most familiar selling tactic for many greenish products, and it is clearly the factor that the Graham-Nyes hope to introduce into the convenience-versus-ethics predicament of the diaper
buyer; in fact, they specifically say they want to be "the Toyota Prius of diapers." GDiapers are more work than disposables, and while the company says the product complies with various official guidelines
that make them safely flushable, there's also a bit on their site about how to handle the "icky" toilet-clog possibility. Still, for parents who find cloth diapers an unacceptable hassle, they provide a
new way to obtain the status (or smugness) of avoiding disposables.
The Graham-Nyes have encouraged gDiapers zealots to spread the word about the product through a "Pioneers" program. And from these core, early consumers they have picked up a fresh perspective. Dads, it turns out, have a "different response" to gDiapers, Jason says. "What they love is that there's no garbage." Soiled disposable diapers are often stuffed into a device that crushes them down by the score, where they sit until they're eventually hauled out with the trash. Stafford,
a marketing professor and a father himself, says he can imagine bragging to other parents about finding a way to avoid disposables on garbage night. "The nonsmell factor" doesn't sound sexy, he says, but it's definitely a concept that even the most eco-indifferent parent can understand. And those, of course, are the parents the Graham-Nyes
want most of all.
Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
In a moment of absolute lunacy last year, I threw gDiaper's hat in the ring to enter the longest relay race in the US...195 miles of sheer running pleasure from Mt Hood to the Coast. 1,000 teams made up of 12,000 runners have lined up each year since 1981. Getting in is nay impossible. So I was shocked to learn we had actually been selected.
My running mate Seth has pulled together 11 elite runners and me. As sponsor I am hoping to score the three shortest, flatest legs of around 5 miles each. The business has really become an impediment on my training.
We have two vans that need decorating (inflatable toilets on the roof?) and have 3 fabulous volunteers that are putting aside 4 hours or so to man (or woman) the course. We have a team name: gDiapers: Just Flush It.
And lawyers standing by ready to manage being sued by Phil Knight. We have t-shirts and hopefully some groovy little giveaways on course.
So with a month to go, it is a great night to start training. And as I am holed up in a hotel in Seattle, I can actually get our for a gallop.